Peer-Reviewed Journals Tutorial
This tutorial will introduce you to peer-reviewed literature in the sciences.
At the end of this tutorial you should know the major criteria of peer-reviewed articles and be able to identify them.
Peer-reviewed journal articles are those that present original research to the scholarly community. These articles go through a process called peer review in which they are assessed and approved by a learned advisory group (i.e. peers) before they are published in journals. In the sciences, peer-reviewed journals may also be called primary research articles, scholarly journal articles, or refereed articles.
The best way to determine if an article has undergone the peer review process is to find evidence that it is required by the journal’s editors or publisher.
Let’s look at an example:

This is a screenshot of NDSU Libraries’ online access to Invasive Plant Science and Management.
(http://www.bioone.org/loi/ipsm)
Information about the Aims & Scope and/or the Author Guidelines will help us determine if this publication is peer-reviewed.
Clicking on the Aims & Scope link, we’ll see the mission of the journal and its intended audience:

Clicking on the Author Guidelines link, we’ll find the requirement that all work must undergo the peer review process:

- present original research
- undergo the peer review process
- be authored by a scholar(s) or researcher(s)
- list earlier research in a bibliography
- follow formal scientific format:
Results
Conclusion
References
- are usually published by a scholarly society or publisher
- have a sober, serious look
- are written in the language of the discipline (i.e. contain specialized terminology)
Here are some differences:
- the purpose of substantive/trade periodicals is to report on developments and trends rather than original research
- there is no peer review process involved in substantive/trade periodicals
- articles may be written by staff, journals, free-lance writers, extension staff
- articles from substantive/trade periodicals do not follow the scientific format
- they may be quite attractive and appeal to a more general audience
- the language used is geared towards an educated audience, but not towards scholars in the field
- sources are sometimes referenced in substantive/trade periodicals, but many times not
Here is a video of three examples:

Can you tell the difference between peer-reviewed (scholarly) and substantive periodicals?


Please click to leave a comment