Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoumare, Ibrahim
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) is the easiest and most widely used model nowadays in statistics. ANOVA however requires a set of assumptions for the model to be a valid choice and for the inferences to be accurate. Among many, ANOVA assumes the data in question is normally distributed and homogenous. However, data from most disciplines does not meet the assumption of normality and/or equal variance. Regrettably, researchers do not always check whether the assumptions are met, and if these assumptions are violated, inferences might well be wrong. We conducted a simulation study to compare the performance of standard ANOVA to Poisson and Negative Binomial models when applied to counts data. We considered different combination of sample sizes and underlying distributions. In this simulation study, we first assed Type I error for each model involved. We then compared power as well as the quality of the estimated parameters across the models.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleComparing Performance of ANOVA to Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression When Applied to Count Dataen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T16:15:16Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T16:15:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/31887
dc.subjectanovaen_US
dc.subjectanova to poisson and negative binomial regressionen_US
dc.subjectcomparing performance of anova to poisson and negative binomialen_US
dc.subjectcount dataen_US
dc.subjectnegative binomialen_US
dc.subjectpoissonen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9783-4666
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
ndsu.collegeScience and Mathematicsen_US
ndsu.departmentStatisticsen_US
ndsu.advisorDoetkott, Curt


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record