Does Mattering Really Matter to Graduate Students?

dc.contributor.authorOst, Jodi Colleen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T16:51:34Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T16:51:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAs graduate student attrition hovers around 50%, scholars are beginning to study what is leading to these high attrition rates (Wao, 2010). As there has been little theoretical work done on graduate student retention, a review of the literature related to undergraduate student engagement and retention provides a starting point for developing theories of graduate student engagement and retention. One theory of undergraduate student engagement and retention relates to feelings of mattering. Mattering is a sense that other people care about you as it involves facets of feeling important to others, being noticed by others, that others are proud of you, and that others rely on you (Elliot, et al., 2004; Rosenberg and McCullough, 1981). Undergraduate student theories on engagement and retention have found that as students’ sense of mattering increases, they are more likely to be engaged in their education and more likely to complete their degrees (Elliott, et al., 2004; Rosenberg and McCullough, 1981). The purpose of this study is to apply the theory of mattering to a graduate student population by using a survey tool to measure mattering developed by France (2011). While the tool was developed for use with undergraduate students, it holds promise as a tool to be used with graduate students. Along with testing France’s (2011) mattering survey tool with graduate students, this study explores the influence of mattering on three persistence variables: the importance to finish, the inclination to transfer, and the inclination to dropout. In addition to the mattering survey, the survey instrument included a brief satisfaction survey (Judge, et al., 1998) and part of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI; Kristensen, et al., 2007). The application of a CFA led to the finding that France’s UMUM15 (2011) need to be reduced to 12 items along with allowing for three correlations errors resulting in a new survey, the GSUMUM-12. Using a GSEM analysis, mattering was found to either directly or indirectly affect the three persistence variables for the graduate students participating in the survey.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/32720
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
dc.titleDoes Mattering Really Matter to Graduate Students?en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.typeVideoen_US
ndsu.advisorHill, Brent
ndsu.collegeHuman Sciences and Educationen_US
ndsu.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
ndsu.departmentEducationen_US
ndsu.programEducationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Does Mattering Really Matter to Graduate Students.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Does Mattering Really Matter to Graduate Students?
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Jodi Ost Dissertation Video.mp4
Size:
197.33 MB
Format:
Mp4
Description:
Jodi Ost Dissertation Video

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: