NDSU North Dakota State University
Fargo, N.D.

NDSU Institutional Repository

Utopia, Desire, and Exigence: Re-Theorizing Utopia as Rhetorical Action

Show simple item record

dc.description.abstract In this paper, I seek to redefine Utopia as a literary genre. Specifically, I argue that Utopias and utopian literature should be read as socially situated actions that are interpreted through an exigence composed of the rhetorical and socio-political situation from which an author writes and a critic reads. In the first half of the paper, I argue that by reading Utopias as actions the inherent subjectivity in literary studies can be redirected in a more positive direction. Instead of arguing about the positive or negative aspects of a utopian work’s content, critics can focus on the effect such texts have in critiquing and reimagining our society. In the second half of the paper, I read Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake against the business practices and advertising of Monsanto Company to suggest ways in which my system of analysis can be more beneficial for utopian studies and leftist literary criticism. en_US
dc.title Utopia, Desire, and Exigence: Re-Theorizing Utopia as Rhetorical Action en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-25T21:23:00Z
dc.date.available 2013-04-25T21:23:00Z
dc.date.issued 2013-04-25
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10365/22773
dc.subject Criticism. en_US
dc.subject Rhetoric. en_US
dc.subject Utopias in literature. en_US
dc.subject Atwood, Margaret, 1939- Oryx and Crake.
dc.subject Monsanto Company. en_US
dc.thesis.degree Paper (M.A.)-- North Dakota State University, 2013. en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Totten, Gary
dc.creator.author Lemke, David Alessandro
dc.degree.departmentCollege Master of Arts / English, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, 2013.
dc.date.created 2013.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


Your Account