Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGautam, Dhan Prasad
dc.description.abstractThe livestock manure management sector is one of the prime sources for the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and other pollutant gases such as ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which may affect the human health, animal welfare, and the environment. So, worldwide investigations are going on to mitigate these gaseous emissions. The overall objective of this research was to investigate different approaches (dietary manipulation and nanotechnology) for mitigating the gaseous emissions from livestock manure system. A field study was conducted to investigate the effect of different levels of dietary proteins (12 and 16%) and fat levels (3 to 5.5%) fed to beef cattle on gaseous emission (methane-CH4, nitrous oxide-N2O, carbon dioxide-CO2 and hydrogen sulfide-H2S) from the pen surface. To evaluate the effects of different nanoparticles (zinc oxide-nZnO; and zirconium-nZrO2) on these gaseous emissions from livestock manure stored under anaerobic conditions, laboratory studies were conducted with different treatments (control, bare NPs, NPs entrapped alginate beads applying freely and keeping in bags, and used NPs entrapped alginate beads). Field studies showed no significant differences in the GHG and H2S emissions from the manure pen surface. Between nZnO and nZrO2, nZnO outperformed the nZrO2 in terms of gases production and concentration reduction from both swine and dairy liquid manure. Application of nZnO at a rate of 3 g L-1 showed up to 82, 78, 40 and 99% reduction on total gas production, CH4, CO2 and H2S concentrations, respectively. The effectiveness of nZnO entrapped alginate (alginate-nZnO) beads was statistically lower than the bare nZnO, but both of them were very effective in reducing gas production and concentrations. These gaseous reductions were likely due to combination of microbial inhibition of microorganisms and chemical conversion during the treatment, which was confirmed by microbial plate count, SEM-EDS, and XPS analysis. However, further research are needed to understand the reduction mechanism and to transfer the technology in a real life application.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2
dc.titleEvaluation of Different Techniques to Control Hydrogen Sulfide and Greenhouse Gases from Animal Production Systemsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.typeVideoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-22T16:51:35Z
dc.date.available2016-01-22T16:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10365/25530
dc.description.sponsorshipState Board of Agricultural Research and Educatioen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorth Dakota Corn Councilen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorth Dakota Pork Councilen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorth Dakota State University. Graduate Schoolen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUSDAen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIFAen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdf
ndsu.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
ndsu.collegeGraduate and Interdisciplinary Studiesen_US
ndsu.departmentAgricultural and Biosystems Engineeringen_US
ndsu.programAgricultural and Biosystems Engineeringen_US
ndsu.advisorRahman, Shafiqur


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record