Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Ryan Lee
dc.description.abstractEnglish Prime is a language prescription advocating the abolition of all forms of the verb “to be” from usage. Such benefits of a “to be”-less form of communication might include an increased appreciation for the essential complexity of reality and the intangibility of certain forms of knowledge. However, to date, no English Prime claims have been rigorously examined in an empirical manner. A program of research systematically assessed individual differences in the use of the verb “to be” to determine their relationship to outcomes described by English Prime scholars. Relations between English Prime violations and the following theoretically relevant measures were examined: dialectical endorsement, temporal nonlinearity, interpersonal complexity, the dialectical self, arrogance, and neuroticism. No support was found for English Prime theory via these measures. Possible reasons for such null results and implications are discussed.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU Policy 190.6.2
dc.titleTo Be or Not To Be: An Empirical Test of English Prime as Theoryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-10T21:05:19Z
dc.date.available2017-10-10T21:05:19Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/26556
dc.subjectEnglish prime
dc.subject.lcshIndividual differencesen_US
dc.subject.lcshLanguage and languagesen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdf
ndsu.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
ndsu.collegeScience and Mathematicsen_US
ndsu.departmentPsychologyen_US
ndsu.programPsychologyen_US
ndsu.advisorRobinson, Michael D.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record