Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRipplinger, David
dc.description.abstractThe justification of government support of rural transit on the basis of the presence of increasing returns to scale and the most efficient regional organization of transit is investigated. Returns to density, size, and scope at most levels of output were found. Cost subadditivity, where a monopoly firm can provide service at a lower cost than two firms, was found for many, but not all observations. The presence of natural monopoly in rural transit in a strict sense is rejected. The findings and implications are directly applicable to rural transit in North Dakota and should be helpful in informing future federal policy as well as rural transit policy, service design, and operation in other states.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU Policy 190.6.2
dc.titleOrganizing Transit in Small Urban and Rural Communitiesen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T01:06:48Z
dc.date.available2017-10-31T01:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/26729
dc.subject.lcshTransportationen_US
dc.subject.lcshRural transiten_US
dc.subject.lcshRural transportationen_US
dc.subject.lcshRural transportation planningen_US
dc.subject.lcshEconomic policyen_US
dc.subject.lcshTransportation and stateen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdf
ndsu.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
ndsu.collegeBusinessen_US
ndsu.departmentTransportation and Logisticsen_US
ndsu.programTransportation and Logisticsen_US
ndsu.advisorBitzan, John


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record