Subsurface drainage (SSD) has been used to remove excess water from fields in the United States upper Midwest for more than a century, but only since the last decade in the Red River Basin of the North in North Dakota (ND). The water leaving from a SSD system can affect both the quality and quantity of water that flows to a surface water system. Therefore, determination of the water balance components is the first step to study the impact of SSD on water quantity, while evapotranspiration (ET), one of the most important components in the water balance, needs to be accurately measured for SSD field. A field experiment was conducted to study the water balance in SSD and undrained (having no artificial drainage system) fields in southeast ND. The field had three different water management systems: 22 ha undrained (UD), 11 ha subsurface drained, and the remaining 11 ha subsurface drained and subsurface irrigated. The ET rates were measured directly using an eddy covariance (EC) system for the SSD and UD fields. The changes in water table were monitored in 8 wells installed in both fields. Rainfall, SSD drainage volume, and soil moisture at six different depths at two locations were measured in both fields. The measurements were conducted in the growing seasons of 2009 and 2010. The ET rates were calculated for two different field crops: Com (Zea Mays) in 2009 and soybean (Glycine Max) in 2010. Crop coefficient (Kc) value was also developed using the ET measured by the EC system and the reference ET (ETref) estimated using the American Society of Civil Engineers Environmental and Water Resources Institute (ASCE-EWRI, alfalfa) method. The ETref was also estimated using the ASCE-EWRI grass and the Jensen Haise (JH) methods. The results indicated that the water table in the SSD field was lower during spring and fall than that in the UD field. The shallow water table and high soil moisture content in the spring and fall have resulted in higher ET rates in the UD field. In the summer, SSD field has favorable soil moisture at the root zone depth; the ET in the SSD field was 30% and 13% higher than that in UD field in summer 2009 and 2010, respectively. For the entire growing season, the ET in the SSD field was 15% higher compared to UD field and the difference was minimal in 2010. Though there were differences in the ET values, they were not statistically different. However, difference in magnitude of ET during summer 2009 yielded a statistical difference. During the peak growing season in July and August, the Kc values were greater in the SSD field due to healthy crops.