Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnor, Kodjo
dc.description.abstractThe herbicide glyphosate has been tested and approved by both the FDA and the USDA, as evidenced by many published research papers, i.e., they are deemed safe for humans, animals, and the environment. However, evidence is mounting that glyphosate interferes with many metabolic processes in plants and animals, and glyphosate residues have been detected in both. The factors that influence the outcomes of previous scientific research on the potential adverse effects of GBH on human and animal health and the environment were investigated. Using DAGs and Granger causality tests, the study found that while private and public organizations were more likely to generate research indicating that GBH was not harmful, public funding and universities were more likely to produce research indicating that GBH was hazardous. Policy actions should be guided by independent research comprised of actors from major stakeholders and research organizations.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleA Meta-Analysis of Studies Addressing the Impact of GBH on Human, Animal Health and the Environmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-02T22:35:01Z
dc.date.available2023-12-02T22:35:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/33282
dc.subjectCausalityen_US
dc.subjectDAGsen_US
dc.subjectEffecten_US
dc.subjectGlyphosateen_US
dc.subjectHerbicideen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
ndsu.collegeAgriculture, Food Systems and Natural Resourcesen_US
ndsu.departmentAgribusiness and Applied Economicsen_US
ndsu.programAgribusiness and Applied Economicsen_US
ndsu.advisorMiljkovic, Dragan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record