Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRabby, Mir Md Fazla
dc.description.abstractThis experiment investigated the primacy of social identification in the online social influence process with anonymity as a contextual variable. Other key variables were perceived argument strength and attitude toward abortion. Participants (N = 229) were randomly exposed to four conditions, in which they read three pro-life or pro-choice arguments from either three identifiable people (known) or three unidentifiable people (unknown). Based on the social identity model of deindividuation (SIDE), the study tested if social identification had a greater effect on attitude in unknown conditions through depersonalization. Results demonstrated that social identification predicted attitude, but anonymity did not affect the process. In other words, depersonalization was not triggered by anonymity. Social identification also affected attitude indirectly (via argument strength). The study also found presence of both group membership-based influence (driven by social identification) and informational influence (driven by argument strength). Implications of the study, especially involving anonymity, were discussed.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleAnonymity, Social Identification, and Online Social Influenceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T16:33:48Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T16:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/33362
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
ndsu.collegeArts, Humanities, and Social Sciencesen_US
ndsu.departmentCommunicationen_US
ndsu.programCommunicationen_US
ndsu.advisorBeck, Stephenson


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record