Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGross, Carla Jean
dc.description.abstractDespite the widespread endorsement of interprofessional education (IPE), health care education has not implemented the strategy to the extent expected. Decisions to adopt and implement IPE must be based on evidence indicating that the approach is superior in promoting collaboration as compared to the traditional, uniprofessional educational approach. Evidence supports that incorporating IPE into the curricula generally improves students' attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge of teamwork skills on a short-term basis. Whether IPE produces graduates who are prepared to collaborate more effectively on the health care team in practice has not been determined because valid instruments have not been developed to measure the collaborative competencies expected for health care students and professionals. This dissertation examined the psychometric properties of an instrument designed by the researcher to measure collaborative competencies in health care students. In addition, this study examined the impact of IPE on undergraduate nursing students' ability to collaborate with other members of the health care team. Using an electronic version of the instrument, data were collected during the spring semester of 2011. The convenience sample (n = 293) included baccalaureate nursing students enrolled at two midwest state universities that incorporated IPE into the curriculum and six midwest state universities that did not incorporate IPE into the curriculum. Factor analysis was conducted using two, four, five, and six factor rotations with varimax and promax rotations. The four- factor model with promax rotation provided the best defined factor structure, demonstrating a combination of empirical findings and theoretical constructs. Results indicated that patient-centered care, role clarification, interprofessional communication, and teamwork are constructs that can be used to design competencies for collaboration. The construct of conflict resolution did not emerge as a separate factor. The independent-samples t-test revealed significant differences between the mean scores for interprofessional communication (p = 0.010) and health care teamwork (p = 0.044) between non-IPE and IPE groups. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed no significant differences for gender, previous experience, or GP A. Students in the older age group (> 31) rated themselves significantly higher in the factors of role clarification (p = 0.002), interprofessional teamwork (p < 0.001), and patient-centered care (p = 0.003).en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleDevelopment of an Instrument to Measure Collaborative Competencies in Interprofessional Health Care Educationen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-29T16:17:27Z
dc.date.available2023-12-29T16:17:27Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/33477
dc.subject.lcshInterprofessional education.en_US
dc.subject.lcshHealth care teams.en_US
dc.subject.lcshNursing students.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
ndsu.collegeArts, Humanities, and Social Sciencesen_US
ndsu.departmentEducationen_US
ndsu.programEducationen_US
ndsu.advisorWood, Nathan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record