Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBakke, Abigail Rose
dc.description.abstractNew technologies often generate fear regarding privacy threats, and social networking sites like Face book have lately experienced the brunt of the criticism. Face book users, even as they post greater amounts of information online, express concern over privacy violations. This paradox suggests that the issue is more complex than the private/public dichotomy and that the rhetoric used during these protests could yield insights regarding the competing worldviews expressed in a privacy debate. My paper examines discourse by the ACLU and Face book at the time the controversial Facebook Places application came out. I use cluster criticism to show how the two rhetors position themselves, each other, Face book users, and users' friends in terms of the degree of control each ;:igent is portrayed as having. My findings suggest that appealing to users' agency will be a key persuasive strategy as concerns over social networking privacy violations increase, and I comment on how sentence structure in corporate discourse can be used to enhance or detract from users' sense of agency when using social networking sites.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleAnalysis of a Facebook Freakout: Rhetoric of Agency in the Places Privacy Debateen_US
dc.typeMaster's Paperen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T15:53:40Z
dc.date.available2024-01-03T15:53:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/33530
dc.subject.lcshOnline social networks.en_US
dc.subject.lcshPrivacy.en_US
dc.subject.lcshRhetoric.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
ndsu.collegeArts, Humanities, and Social Sciencesen_US
ndsu.departmentEnglishen_US
ndsu.programEnglishen_US
ndsu.advisorMara, Andrew


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record