Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoll, Amelia Kaye
dc.description.abstractUsing a basic qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with five agents in North Dakota with a range of experiences and lengths of service to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Common Measures, a set of survey instruments designed to assess the impact of the 4-H program. The study addresses the culture of North Dakota Extension’s views on evaluation and the implementation of Common Measures. The use of a state-wide reporting tool to assess the 4-H program in North Dakota was perceived as necessary, however, many agents felt Common Measures, missed the mark and did not meet the North Dakota reporting. The ability to tell the story of the 4-H program and the long-term impact it has on youth is necessary to the success of any state-wide reporting venture. Additional training on how alternative forms of data collection can be used to tell the story of their program is needed.en_US
dc.publisherNorth Dakota State Universityen_US
dc.rightsNDSU policy 190.6.2en_US
dc.titleUsing the Common Measures Evaluation Tool in North Dakota: A Qualitative Studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T16:58:20Z
dc.date.available2020-09-29T16:58:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10365/31556
dc.subject4-Hen_US
dc.subjectcommon measuresen_US
dc.subjectextensionen_US
dc.subjectyouth developmenten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1053-3316
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdfen_US
ndsu.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
ndsu.collegeHuman Sciences and Educationen_US
ndsu.departmentEducationen_US
ndsu.programExtension Educationen_US
ndsu.advisorMarx, Adam


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record